Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2021 2:56:50 GMT
To CGY Dahlin
To DAL Romanov Kravtsov 2023 1st PP (CGY)
2022 2023 2nd PP (CGY) Mod edit: this was originally posted as 2022 but on the Fantrax notes stated as 2023.
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 3:30:16 GMT
Confirmed.
Betting big on Dahlin being that true #1 stud dman. Paid a hefty sum for him so he best damned worked out.
Thanks for hearing my offers WalkwithElias.
|
|
|
Post by fordprefect on Mar 29, 2021 14:34:01 GMT
I’m having a hard time with this trade for a few reasons, so I objected to it.
First off, Dan has said he’s leaving after this year, so I don’t think a departing GM should make deals of this magnitude. Judgement calls like that should be left to the new GM.
Aside from that, I think the balance of this deal is way off. Dahlin is a former 1st OA pick, so he has lots of hype and luster. But Nail Yakupov was a former 1st OA pick too. Consider that Dobber currently ranks Dahlin at #12, between Barrie and Krug. That’s Dobber so it’s a fantasy value, not a reflection of his skill ranking. But fantasy value is what we’re dealing with. I would not trade Romanov, who is a top 20 D prospect on Dobber, plus what amounts to 3 NHL 1st round picks for Barrie or Krug.
The clincher is the 2023 1st pp. That’s the Connor Bedard draft year, and I can’t see the Calgary roster being rebuilt enough to avoid being a lottery pick by 2023. No offense Dan. I know you have a bundle of 2022 1st PPs, but those typically take 2-3 yers to be NHL regulars, let alone major contributors.
The way I see this deal is: Dahlin ... whose fantasy value Dobber pegs at equivalent to Barrie or Krug
For
Romanov...a top 15-20 D prospect Kravstov....a #9 OA pick with a strong young nucleus in New York A 2023 2nd that will be equivalent to a top 25 NHL pick a 2023 1st that has a strong chance of becoming Connor Bedard
To me, that doesn't square.
|
|
|
Post by foreverflamefan on Mar 29, 2021 15:00:06 GMT
I think it’s a fair trade.
Calgary overpaid a little, but for the right reason. I feel he didn’t have a franchise D around, whereas the Stars had a surplus of great D and was able to sacrifice their best valued D to grab assets for the future.
In a points-only production league, Romanov doesn’t have as much value (yet), since he hasn’t exactly been lighting it up with the minutes he’s been getting. Kravtsov is still a magic bean. Russians are so hard to predict.
As for the draft picks, yes, there’s Bedard. But, it’s not a guarantee that Calgary would win Bedard. I think they’re going all in on Wright, who is no slouch either.
It’s a clear win for Calgary right now but Dallas is willing to sacrifice a great player for a potential sky rocket return in the long run. That’s about as Dahlin of a trade that I would expect. Dallas cashing in on their surplus and Calgary trying to build their team with a valuable keeper for years to come.
|
|
|
Post by cyclone on Mar 29, 2021 15:07:41 GMT
I agree with Lyle
Seems significantly unbalanced
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 15:17:12 GMT
So the fact I may be leaving at the end of the year prevents me from attempting to make the team better for myself if I decide to stay or for the incoming GM who takes over.
Okie dokie.
Cancel the trade then.
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 15:23:59 GMT
Whether I stay or go shouldn't have any bearing on any trade I make. I paid essentially a bunch of magic beans for a magic bean that's partially sprouted.
It's all a gamble.
|
|
|
Post by foreverflamefan on Mar 29, 2021 15:24:47 GMT
This makes no sense. Even if dammage left, are you telling me that the new GM would be absolutely disgusted that he has Dahlin? Calgary has a surplus of quality prospect picks, why not use them to get a keeper upgrade?
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 15:30:10 GMT
I'm pretty proud of the prospect base I've built for me or the new guy. So much so that I believed I could use some of them to grab players like Dahlin of I needed.
If it gets voted down then whatever. I know I overpaid, but it wasn't without thought.
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 15:36:03 GMT
I should really clarify how this trade unfolded.
Offer 1: Kravtsov, Nesterov Declined
Offer 2: Kravtsov, Romanov No response
Offer 3: Kravtsov, Romanov, the 2 picks. Deal accepted.
No negotiations, just me throwing mud at the wall until it stuck.
And this was in the span of 3 or 4 days. Not some by the hour desperate plunge.
|
|
|
Post by cyclone on Mar 29, 2021 15:36:04 GMT
My view was on the deal itself. Has nothing to do with you staying or not. To me, my opinion only, large price to pay for Dahlin. Unless 6 people agree, the deal goes through. Let the process play out.
|
|
|
Post by foreverflamefan on Mar 29, 2021 15:39:30 GMT
My view was on the deal itself. Has nothing to do with you staying or not. To me, my opinion only, large price to pay for Dahlin. Unless 6 people agree, the deal goes through. Let the process play out. Dahlin was a former 1st OA highly regarded as a generational talent. It’s been a rough go in Buffalo, but who isn’t in that tire fire? I am willing to bet that Dallas also had another suitor or two. Calgary overpaid to grab him. If I’m a rebuilding team I send that offer and don’t look back. When you only have 15 minor prospect spots to work with you have to always look for ways to upgrade your keeper positions. That’s just my line of thinking.
|
|
|
Post by fordprefect on Mar 29, 2021 15:48:53 GMT
So toss out my concern about a departing GM making or not making trades. I still feel the trade is greatly unbalanced in fantasy terms. Debate it on those terms and rule out the departing factor.
As for departing GMs not making trades, that wasn’t meant personally. That’s the way it’s been in other leagues I’ve been in. It’s a general practice to prevent departing GMs from going scorched earth. That’s what I was basing that on. And the last word I heard was that you were leaving after this season. That was from your post back in January, so that was what I was going on. I take it that you’re reconsidering?
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 15:56:52 GMT
So toss out my concern about a departing GM making or not making trades. I still feel the trade is greatly unbalanced in fantasy terms. Debate it on those terms and rule out the departing factor. As for departing GMs not making trades, that wasn’t meant personally. That’s the way it’s been in other leagues I’ve been in. It’s a general practice to prevent departing GMs from going scorched earth. That’s what I was basing that on. And the last word I heard was that you were leaving after this season. That was from your post back in January, so that was what I was going on. I take it that you’re reconsidering? I'm more undecided than I was at the beginning of the year. Regardless, I've been making picks and trades based off of the idea that I was leaving and giving the incoming GM as best a foundation I can provide. Not a scorched earth eff you I'm out of here mentality at all. So in essence, I'm building this foundation for me or a new gm. Whatever happens this team will be good to go next year and onward.
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 15:57:54 GMT
Again, If this gets voted down I will try to rework it. I feel Dahlin is a worthy strike.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2021 16:17:06 GMT
To CGY Dahlin To DAL Romanov Kravtsov 2023 1st PP (CGY) 2022 2nd PP (CGY) The way I see this Nothing indicates Romanov is a high point scorer Kravtsov is a good draft pic but is behind on the depth chart in Nyr but decent prosepct 1st 2023 Cgy is banking on being better by then 2022 2nd pp, are a crap shoot at best Dahlin is not doing bad on a terrible teams and still way before his prime. It seems very legit to me. both sides gambling
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2021 16:18:50 GMT
I’m having a hard time with this trade for a few reasons, so I objected to it. First off, Dan has said he’s leaving after this year, so I don’t think a departing GM should make deals of this magnitude. Judgement calls like that should be left to the new GM. Aside from that, I think the balance of this deal is way off. Dahlin is a former 1st OA pick, so he has lots of hype and luster. But Nail Yakupov was a former 1st OA pick too. Consider that Dobber currently ranks Dahlin at #12, between Barrie and Krug. That’s Dobber so it’s a fantasy value, not a reflection of his skill ranking. But fantasy value is what we’re dealing with. I would not trade Romanov, who is a top 20 D prospect on Dobber, plus what amounts to 3 NHL 1st round picks for Barrie or Krug. The clincher is the 2023 1st pp. That’s the Connor Bedard draft year, and I can’t see the Calgary roster being rebuilt enough to avoid being a lottery pick by 2023. No offense Dan. I know you have a bundle of 2022 1st PPs, but those typically take 2-3 yers to be NHL regulars, let alone major contributors. The way I see this deal is: Dahlin ... whose fantasy value Dobber pegs at equivalent to Barrie or Krug For Romanov...a top 15-20 D prospect Kravstov....a #9 OA pick with a strong young nucleus in New York A 2023 2nd that will be equivalent to a top 25 NHL pick a 2023 1st that has a strong chance of becoming Connor Bedard To me, that doesn't square. Also I think posting your Veto reason, while good to do does influence others and therefore should probably be posted after the vote? Thoughts
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Mar 29, 2021 16:23:50 GMT
To CGY Dahlin To DAL Romanov Kravtsov 2023 1st PP (CGY) 2022 2nd PP (CGY) The way I see this Nothing indicates Romanov is a high point scorer Kravtsov is a good draft pic but is behind on the depth chart in Nyr but decent prosepct 1st 2023 Cgy is banking on being better by then 2022 2nd pp, are a crap shoot at best Dahlin is not doing bad on a terrible teams and still way before his prime. It seems very legit to me. both sides gambling All picks are 2023
|
|
|
Post by furnaceface on Mar 29, 2021 16:29:28 GMT
If they are all 2023 then the original post is wrong and needs to be clarified by Elias as it’s stated 2022 2nd. Will need him to post up that he’s fine with that before this one goes through.
EDIT: the Fantrax post does show in the notes both are 2023. I don’t know if that changes an opinions or not but it needs to be clarified. I have edited the original post to reflect 2023 2nd.
|
|
slots881
Junior
Posts: 232
Classic: Edmonton
|
Post by slots881 on Mar 29, 2021 16:47:22 GMT
I sent an offer and never heard back. 🤷♂️
|
|
|
Post by drcor on Mar 29, 2021 16:53:34 GMT
I agree that there is some sticker shock here. But the more I digest it, the more I think it will balance out. Like Darren, I think Romanov will be a better irl defenseman than a fantasy one, and if this trade happened last year when Buffalo was only a derailment instead of a full scale disaster, I don’t think anyone would blink an eye. I think Dan’s move has some saavy, with the caveat that Buffalo will have to one day turn things around to pay off. 💰
|
|
|
Post by foreverflamefan on Mar 29, 2021 17:00:39 GMT
I sent an offer and never heard back. 🤷♂️ I mean, that happens to me plenty of times. I just always assume that there was a GM that bested me. And that almost always is the case. Would I like a reply? Probably, but oh well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2021 19:37:36 GMT
I feel like for Dahlin I’m not just going to give him up for not the right price so I held firm until I felt like I was getting the right return for a young Dman with a lot of upside
|
|
|
Post by redhawk12 on Mar 30, 2021 3:46:24 GMT
I don't really like Dahlin as far as former #1 picks go, but Kravtsov and Romanov are not significant peices to give up. I agree that Romanov probably won't be a huge point producer. I think Kravtsov might be a downright bust if I'm honest. The pick is probably going to be a high one but it's two years away plus whatever time it takes for that player to make the NHL. I think it's a reasonable trade.
|
|
|
Post by fordprefect on Apr 14, 2021 15:18:16 GMT
Pick list updated. Please check for accuracy.
|
|