|
|
Post by furnaceface on Dec 1, 2021 21:06:58 GMT
To Flames
Bailey
ARZ 2022 3rd UFA
To Jets
Granlund
CGY 2022 5th UFA
I think Bailey has a higher ceiling but he’s not doing it this year and Granlund seems oddly lights out on a traditionally low scoring Preds team. Dam had offered up Granlund, I expressed interest, he suggested this option. Makes sense for me this year.
easy peasy.
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Dec 1, 2021 21:13:16 GMT
Confirmed. Was seeking a puck upgrade, this was in line with a couple of other offers, I chose this one.
I'm sorry for being a bad gm to the few GMS I've delayed responses to involved with this player. Genuinely sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by drcor on Dec 1, 2021 22:05:39 GMT
Full disclosure: I was in on making the trade offer on Granlund.
With that said, I think Dammage is getting ripped off hugely in this one
|
|
slots881
Junior
Posts: 232
Classic: Edmonton
|
Post by slots881 on Dec 1, 2021 23:36:53 GMT
I made a similar offer, darn it. Win some, lose some
|
|
|
|
Post by ToeMata42 on Dec 2, 2021 16:52:40 GMT
Normally I wouldn’t care, but Winnipeg is already a top team, and doesn’t need the break. If the trade was reversed, I’d have no problem with it. Calgary is nota contender. But this one looks bad.
But we are grown ups, and this is for fun. I know I’ve made a couple of lop sided trades, I was happy with, that might have had some gms shaking their heads.
Dan - tor
|
|
|
|
Post by fordprefect on Dec 3, 2021 5:42:43 GMT
The trade received enough votes for a review so it’s in limbo for now. As co-commissioner I’ll arbitrate this one since Dave is one of the trade partners. Will those who voted and the two trade partners please send their rationale to me by PM. I don’t want people to post in this thread as public discussion can get sensitive. There can be public debate after if people wish. For the record, I didn’t vote on the trade. I feel it’s out of balance but I’ve seen lots that I thought were worse pass the sniff test. Nevertheless, the required number of people feel it didn’t pass the sniff test, so send me your rationale.
|
|
slots881
Junior
Posts: 232
Classic: Edmonton
|
Post by slots881 on Dec 3, 2021 6:41:55 GMT
Interesting. I didn't vote against it either. I didn't know we had that many active GM's!
|
|
|
|
Post by fordprefect on Dec 4, 2021 2:54:28 GMT
Based on consultation with the dissenting voters the original trade has been cancelled and a suggestion made for a revised version. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
Post by furnaceface on Dec 4, 2021 20:12:29 GMT
We revised this, and added to it so ya’ll can freak out more.
To Flames
Bailey
Ekholm
2nd UFA 2022
5th UFA 2022 <—-note in Fantrax this say a 6th, we will correct post trade
To Jets
Granlund
gavrikov
The first part of the deal matches the guidance given above. The additions are the D swap and an additional pick. I’m selling low on Ekholm and buying high on Gavrikov. Gavrikov has not hit 20 points in previous seasons and could easily go cold while Ekholm could easily get back to career numbers. I think this is a big gamble on my part but I need a healthy semi productive dman vs Ekholm who has been a drag so far.
edit, for more details, I asked if there was and interest in moving a Dman, suggested Gav or Zub, ignoring his obvious keepers and let him decide if either of those worked. The original deal we agreed on was different than above, but I ran it past Lyle for guidance and he thought an adjustment would make it even better.
Come at me with your vetos. vote it down if you want, make Dan a better offer, I’ll cancel the deal if he gets something he shouldn’t refuse.
|
|
dammage79
Junior
Posts: 339
Classic: Calgary
Dynasty: Devils
|
Post by dammage79 on Dec 4, 2021 21:05:18 GMT
Confirmed. We reworked it to balance it out. It grew. I'm in a rebuild. I dont need overproducting veterans toying with my rebuild.
|
|
